From The Washington Post last week: “Scientists now say this worst-case climate scenario is ‘implausible.’ The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is finally acknowledging the plain truth by backing off its most extreme doomsday emission scenario, known in big-climate lingo as RCP 8.5, after admitting that those projections “have become implausible.”
You don’t say.
The fact of the matter is that the IPCC has been working diligently to get the world wound up over climate change projections that were wildly pessimistic from the get-go. This does not reflect well on their acumen or trustworthiness.
Unfortunately, it’s about par for the course.
Any climate expert who viewed the data without the lens of progressive ideology in the way should have known that the most apocalyptic outcomes of climate change were unlikely. Within the realm of the possible? Yes. Likely enough to upend entire industries and economies? Absolutely not. The only reason this projection persisted as long as it did was because it granted career government bureaucrats and NGOs vast regulatory powers to shape economies and social policies. It was crack for public sector policy nerds.
I wonder if the fact that NPR, CNBC, and others are in the process of eliminating or drastically shrinking their “climate desks” has anything to do with the fact that even the “experts” now admit that we aren’t all going to die due to climate change anytime soon?
It’s almost not possible to heap enough scorn on these people, but let’s give it a go. From Covid to climate change to DEI to devaluing meritocracy to attacks on scientific reality itself, the 21st century has been an era of arm-twisting from authorities seeking to impose onerous social and financial policies forestalling some imminent catastrophe. And time after time, the public has been misled. Now the bill for the embellishment and browbeating is coming due in the form of an unprecedented decline in the public’s trust in experts.
Why have such large segments of our expert class turned out to be either incompetent or disingenuous? It’s a fail either way, but the exact why is important.
Though knowledge, as it turns out, is overrated, power is certainly not. I’ve never heard of the knowledge that is. But the powers that be—now that’s recognized all the way from Wall Street to Juba.
It turns out that the powers that be have historically sought the means to impose the proper way of thinking on the otherwise unpersuadable, unwashed masses. We know what’s best for you even if you don’t. That paradigm is alive and well. Right, wrong, or reason have nothing to do with anything.
The January 2017 cover of National Geographic magazine featured a 9-year-old Missouri child, Avery Jackson, as a vanguard in the brave new world of transgender medicine. Why National Geographic thought that this was relevant to the vast majority of their readers is a head-scratcher all by itself. But the entire subject has not aged well.
I triple-dog dare you to explain to me how this plain medical malpractice arose from the careful, scientifically informed deliberations of an entire posse of rational, well-adjusted adult professionals tasked with shepherding children safely through adolescence. No amount of insouciance explains this; it’s straight-up Revenge of the Nerds, but way less funny and with much bigger idiots. The people who did this to Avery Jackson are so grossly maladjusted that the world would have been better off if they had been hauled out of their family igloo at birth and immediately tossed into the ocean. Since that didn’t happen, they should now be sued into oblivion. All involved with this have forfeited their expectation that anyone should ever take them seriously again. Unfortunately, that’s not going to happen either. Failing upward is the norm in the expert class.
Americans have grown very weary of experts they don’t much like or trust talking down to them. That’s a major reason why Donald Trump has been elected president twice. Want to knock the smug right out of some highly credentialed, completely full-of-BS expert? Say hello to my little friend.
The worst part of the betrayal of America by the expert class is very personal. As a physicist, I am an erstwhile member of the expert class. I watched all of this unfold from the inside. Imagine my bitter disappointment watching classical science, centuries in the making, destroy its credibility in the eyes of the public in less than a decade. I can explain it plainly: it’s like watching someone burn a book that you spent your entire life writing.
That’s not going to just buff out, because science is, at some level, based on trust. This is necessarily so because not everyone has the wherewithal or interest to investigate science to the degree required to distinguish it from religion.
The problem is that a lot of that trust in experts of all types has been lost in the past few years as entire fields have been co-opted and corrupted by ideology. Activists have captured entire professional organizations, viewing objective data (which may not say what they want) the way ants view a can of Raid.
Occasionally, I wonder if there is an unseen hand behind the decline of science and expertise into a 21st-century house of Babel. That would almost make me feel better than us having screwed it up all by ourselves. The first step in control through propaganda isn’t getting people to believe something; it’s getting them not to believe anything. That’s pretty much where we are right now. But who benefits?
I can come up with a few scenarios. You think that the banking industry, for instance, really wants most future borrowers to get enough education to discover linear equations and amortization tables? Hell no. As soon as consumers figure out compound interest, they become investors instead of borrowers.
That’s the power of knowledge. Maybe the powers that be are laughing at people like me who foolishly valued knowledge over wealth because they imagined that knowledge was power and that power belonged to the people. What a bunch of naïfs.
Seeing how things have worked out, they’re not wrong.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In