Yet again, Pocatello residents are given an example of ill-advised use of public funds with the announcement of the search for a new city logo.

It begs the question, why does a city even need a flag or a logo?

Here are a few suggestions for better use of $90K in no particular order;:

Three starter salaries for city workers; Money toward Aide for Friends renovation;

Repair/ replace faulty sidewalks for public safety (property owners aren't doing it);

Art in the parks projects; Greenway expansion; K- 9 safety vests; K-9 officers/training;

Land for tiny homes; Tiny homes for the homeless; Rent reduction for poverty level individuals; Food bank donations; Purchase of one property along the river for future greenway expansion; Help with leaf/snow removal for the handicapped; Funds for subway walkway renovation; Expansion of Old Town street lamp program; Additional code enforcement officers; Tree replacement in town;Funding account for art museum; Funding toward Bonneville neighborhood housing project; Funds toward renovation of derelict hotel on West Center; Funding for free spay and neuter program; Return of public access television;

With a little thought, citizens could think of many better uses of that money.

Emily Bennett

Pocatello

Recommended for you

Welcome to the discussion!

The Idaho State Journal invites you to take part in the community conversation. But those who don't play nice may be uninvited.

Comments that are:

  • off topic
  • defamatory
  • libelous
  • obscene
  • racist
  • abusive
  • threatening
  • an invasion of privacy (doxxing)
  • profane (including attempts to misspell profanity in order to get around the profanity filter)

will be deleted. Repeat offenders will lose commenting privileges.

Comments are opinions of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions or views of Idaho State Journal.