The word “precinct” has two roots: “pre” — before, and “cinct” — from the Latin “cingere”, to surround and contain (the root of “cinch”). At its broadest usage, it merely means an area to check before you know it is secure.
In the 1500s British constables identified the geographic neighborhood kept safe by a single policeman making daily rounds. This became a “police precinct.”
But how “precinct” became part of American politics sheds a fascinating light on how our Constitutional Republic works.
The U.S. Constitution doesn’t mention precincts or even parties. What is infused through the document is a concept made popular a century earlier: John Locke’s premise that all legitimate government must flow from “the consent of the governed.”
This concept came to a head with one of the first major decisions facing the newly created United States of America: whether or not to form a national bank.
International trade with the original thirteen colonies relied on foreign currencies, top among them the Spanish gold “real,” translated into English as a “dollar.” But the paper notes issued by the Continental Congress quickly became worthless when no European trader could actually obtain three Spanish gold pieces for a three-dollar Continental note.
The thriving businesses at seaports up and down the East Coast, from Boston to Atlanta, desperately needed a bank that would, by law, honor the new American currency. Taking up this cause was none other than New York’s own Alexander Hamilton.
Hamilton knew consent to create a national bank had to come “from the people.” And that was a problem: the “people” were represented by voters, defined at the time as “landowners.” American land was the collateral that would back a national bank, and private landowners were not liking that idea.
So, Hamilton sailed up and down the coast meeting with dockworkers, longshoremen, warehousemen, and bank clerks, selling them shares in 50-acre parcels of land. This made them all “landowners,” allowing them to vote.
The first of such land deals was done at Tontine’s Coffee House on the corner of Water and Wall in New York’s port district. Collaborative land investments designed to “create” large groups of voters were thereafter called “Tontines.”
In the Presidential election of 1796, John Adams, a “pro-national bank” candidate, beat Thomas Jefferson, the chief opponent of a national bank, by a single electoral vote. Hamilton’s success rallying (maybe “creating”) voters had become a call to action for Jefferson and his supporters, including Virginia plantation owner James Madison.
To counter the “coffeehouse” network, Madison suggested organizing the countryside, creating a communication network that could link every household. The “area in which one man on horseback can visit every house in one day” became his party’s “precinct.”
Coffeehouse networks (used by the “Federalists”) failed in every election after 1896. Jefferson’s and Madison’s Republican “precincts” prevailed and their party was successful in the next six elections in a row. Today, the precinct is the basic unit around which our representational “consent of the people” is obtained.
Here in Idaho in 2024, Donald Trump will not appear on your May 21st Primary Ballot. Thank Dorothy Moon for that. Next in line would be the race for U.S. Senator . . . but we have none in Idaho this year.
So, 2024 is a good year to focus on the bottom of the ballot. Check the race for “precinct committeeman.”
In our Constitutional Republic, your precinct leader is the one directly responsible for getting every other candidate on your ballot into office. As the word itself implies, this would be the first place to check before you know the Republic is secure.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In