Logo

    POCATELLO — Mayor Brian Blad’s practice of sending city paving crews or equipment to other cities — including McCammon, Victor, Driggs and American Falls — without approval by the Pocatello City Council has come to a halt, according to council members.

    “It never came before the council and we never knew anything about it,” Councilman Steve Brown said about city crews being authorized by Mayor Blad to do work in other communities. “At this point, I don’t think there will be any more.”

    “We’ve had some discussion about this and it won’t happen again,” said Councilman Gary Moore. “I was as surprised to see it on the news as anyone else.”

    Idaho law does allow cities to enter into agreements to do public works for each other, but such action requires approval by respective city councils.

    Idaho Statute 40-708 states: “By mutual cooperative written agreements, or in the event of emergencies or other unusual circumstances where the financial or general welfare of the people is concerned, two (2) or more units of government may, upon a showing of cause declared and entered upon the minutes of an official meeting ... share jointly the costs of the maintenance, construction or development of highways and bridges in any state, county, district or city system.”

    Mayor Blad apparently authorized city crews and equipment to engage in work this spring and summer outside of Pocatello without such agreements.

    “Our office was never asked to prepare an inter-governmental agreement to bring to the council for approval,” said Pocatello City Attorney Dean Tranmer.

    Tranmer said such agreements generally spell out the responsibilities of both parties, including the payment of costs.

    Brown said the Pocatello Council is still waiting for specific information on any reimbursements paid to Pocatello for the expenses of paving projects in other communities and wear and tear on equipment.

    “We have the responsibility to taxpayers,” Brown said about the council determining if the city has been paid.

    Moore shared he same sentiments.

    “There’s just not much for us to gain by doing this,” Moore said about work done in other cities. “I just don’t see the upside to the city.”

    Mayor Blad has told reporters that he was simply allowing Pocatello to be a “good neighbor” when he authorized the recent out-of-town paving projects and it also was something done before he became mayor in 2008. Attempts to reach Blad were unsuccessful Friday.

    Rumors have been circulated that Blad’s policy of sending crews out of town on jobs led to the resignation of former Pocatello Streets Superintendent Randy Ghezzi, but Ghezzi said that is not true in a telephone conversation with the Journal on Friday. He said he left Pocatello to become operations director in Scottsdale, Ariz., because it was an opportunity for advancement.

    “I loved my job here (in Pocatello), but you have to go someplace else to make a little more money,” Ghezzi said. “I’ve always wanted to manage a much larger city.”

    Ghezzi has been working in Scottsdale with a population of 220,000 for three weeks since leaving his Pocatello job on July 3.

    Ghezzi said it was his understanding that Pocatello crews doing jobs in other cities was a common practice in the past. He had worked in the Gate City for five years.

    “We always have concerns when we work outside of town, but you do what you’re told to do,” he said.

    Ghezzi also said he didn’t want to get involved in the “political football” that has surfaced regarding city crews working out of town.

    Former Pocatello Mayor Roger Chase said using city street crews outside of the city was never a common practice during his eight years as mayor. He said the city did cooperate with Bannock County on some paving work on a couple of occasions and the council approved allowing Blackfoot to use Pocatello equipment to strip asphalt one time in exchange for Blackfoot repairing the equipment so it was useable.

    “They serviced it and got it ready for us to sell,” Chase said. “We had an agreement with the council and they compensated us for it.”

    The former mayor said the Pocatello council shied away from these mutual agreements for things like street work because of the potential negative impact on private contractors.

    Chase said on one other occasion, Pocatello loaned Chubbuck some garbage trucks when that city was going through a transition involving garbage service and needed to remove trash for health reasons.

    “It (working for other cities) was not something that went on all the time,” Chase said.

Recommended for you

Welcome to the discussion!

The Idaho State Journal invites you to take part in the community conversation. But those who don't play nice may be uninvited.

Comments that are:

  • off topic
  • defamatory
  • libelous
  • obscene
  • racist
  • abusive
  • threatening
  • an invasion of privacy (doxxing)
  • profane (including attempts to misspell profanity in order to get around the profanity filter)

will be deleted. Repeat offenders will lose commenting privileges.

Comments are opinions of the author only, and do not reflect the opinions or views of Idaho State Journal.

(6) comments

enjoyit

Mayors & city councilmen need to be held accountable fof their stupid mistakes, especially in Chubbuck.

Moon Beam

Mayor Blad needs to be recalled !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

DC NYLA

Anyone watching local TV news last night was treated to a Mayor Blad 3-pete First, he contradicted his earlier statements by denying ever having knowledge of the "Street Department Affair." Then, for good measure, he wrapped himself in the City Council, and announced that they were in the dark too.

The best part, however, was his stretching of logic: Apparently, Idaho State forced him to do it. Huh?

Well, his reasoning was something like this: The state doesn't provide local governments with enough funding for streets, roads and bridges. So, he decided to help out our neighbors by sending Pocatello Street Department road crews to lend a hand.

One problem with that: Pocatello is also short-changed by the State. So, where did that extra money come from to allow us to help others?

As I see it, every time we spend money on others' problems, we have less money to solve our own.

This whole thing is a mess, and is apparently illegal. Not to mention that, in some cases, our government was openly competing with the private sector.

Time to start an investigation with an impartial 3rd party. Are you listening Idaho State Attorney General Lawrence Wasden?

normaldude

Lol.....is the mayor accountable for his actions? Pretty sure he told a different story before. Of course this info is coming from a biased news source. So, who knows?[censored]

hkdelahunt

As this year progresses it appears that Mr. Blad thought he was the Emperor of Pocatello and accountable to no one. Since the last election he as become dictatorial and is often critical of current council members who oppose his actions or contest his authority. It is also apparent, and common knowledge in the community, that he felt so threatened by the strong leadership of Roger Bray, who served as the past Council President, that he recruited Mr. Orr to run agains Mr. Bray, and worked tirelessly to get Mr. Orr elected because he is able control Mr. Orr. This was out of fear that Mr. Bray was going to run against him for Mayor. Mayor Blad also felt so confident in his ability to control Mr. Cooper, that he worked behind the scenes to get a three way race going so that Mr. Cooper would be able to retain his office. Mayor Blad also supported a candidate to oppose Mr. Moore.

The election results appear to have inflated his ego to the point that he feels he does not need to answer to protocol or law. His new found strength, after defeating Roger Chase and getting Orr and Cooper elected and nearly defeating Mr. Moore, has provided him with the belief that he can now work outside of the city council and its rules.

We are now able to see the Mayor for who he is, another manipulating, self-serving, egomaniac who lives the spotlight and keeps people distracted from the real plight of our city and our economy.
Helen Delahunt Avila

Red Barns

Why is this story so important?

One, what Blad did appears to be illegal (the punishment for conviction being his removal from office).

Two, when asked about the City doing road work in other jurisdictions, he's lied multiple times: Everything from denying it happened, to implying we were paid for the work, to stating that the City has always done things like this, to emphatically stating that it never involved City employees. We now know that all his statements are false. Where else has he twisted the truth?

Three (and this probably should be number one), undercutting local for-profit businesses with taxpayer-supported Government services runs counter to everything we stand for as a State.

Then, there is number four (and, this one's a big one): On August 7th, we will all learn how much our taxes are going up for next year. Rumor has it that the increase will be over 4%. This, from a City that had a budget surplus just 4 years ago.

Why is this story so important? Well, it appears we have a Mayor who is willing to give-away our tax-supported services to other Cities, while increasing our taxes to pay for it.

We're being played for suckers!