POCATELLO — New policies will be implemented for all city management following an audit by Deaton and Co. that examined the city's use of street department crews and equipment in other communities the past three years.
In a 7-page audit summary by Deaton released Thursday afternoon the report said: “Although there appears to be an abuse of authority, because of the nature of fraud, no assurances can be given that fraud does not exist. However, based upon the result of our examination, there is currently insufficient evidence to support the conclusion that assets were misappropriated.”
Pocatello Mayor Brian Blad said he was satisfied with the report.
“I think Deaton did the work within the scope they were asked,” Blad said.
In its audit conclusion, Deaton did mention the mayor's office and its role in approval of street construction in communities including Chubbuck, Driggs, Victor, Teton County, American Falls and McCammon without approval by the Council or signed agreements to reimburse Pocatello.
“During the investigation it became clear that various levels of management within the city of Pocatello do not fully understand their level of authority,” the recommendation section of the report reads. “There was confusion as to what authority the mayor held and what authority the superintendent held. There was also a lack of supporting evidence of communication between management and when to communicate with City Council.”
The findings also said: “...in the event the city wishes to address a need in another jurisdiction, and there are funds available to do that, the department head and/or mayor should bring the issue to Council, and if approval is given, the project should be memorialized by an inter-governmental agreement.”
The Deaton audit found the city paid at least $15,773.50 in labor for the benefit of other municipalities outside of city limits and incurred wear and tear for the use of equipment on out- of town projects during the past three years.
Mayor Blad said the city will not try to bill these outside communities for the work.
As far as new policies designed to stop future problems, Blad said the city is already drafting those.
“Those policies will be coming sooner rather than later,” Blad said.
New city policies will specify the responsibilities of management and set up safeguards and better communication between departments. Blad said one of the changes will be to create a better communication system between the city's finance and street departments.
Councilman Steve Brown said new policies were critical as well as the appropriate training for city department heads.
“There will be no doubt what anybody's role is when we're done,” Brown said. “There should be no doubt about bringing these issues before the City Council.”
Councilman Gary Moore said the audit shows there is a need to improve the relationships between the mayor and department heads and “at what point in time they have to come before the City Council.”
Moore said the audit was essential given what happened with the city doing projects outside of city limits.
“Absolutely, we had a situation where we needed a party outside of the city to take a look at it,” Moore said.
“It is what it is,” councilman Michael Orr said about the audit.
“New policies will stop this in the future up to and including termination for violations,” he added.
In its audit findings, Deaton said that work outside city limits was not isolated to the past three years it examined.
“The city has provided services to entities outside the incorporated limits for numerous years,” the report said. “However, there was no supporting evidence found disclosing the proper authorization of such services and the use of city assets during the period examined.”
The City Council formally requested an audit of street department activities since 2011 last summer after they became aware of the city's involvement in projects outside of Pocatello.



(8) comments
Let me see the auditor is the same auditor that found nothing wrong when they audited the city’s books as part of their paid regualr services each year. Did they really want to perhaps demonstrate that their audits were inaccurate or incomplete and perhaps inherit some culpability or liability?
They only talked to people that could be part of the abuse. There was no power of subpoena used as an investigating tool. There is no reference to anyone beyond the present council and mayor as interviewees and do not reference any rank and file workers as those interviewed to see if the mayor or others ever showed up to follow through on a directive. It appears that no emails, letters, texts or other permanent records were sought by the investigation. They are probably very telling and should have been researched.
Where are the light of day efforts to seek contacts that may be able to show that the Mayor or someone else was indeed informed that the city was operating way out of bounds and that it continued to do so despite that awareness being asserted?
It is amazing that while the city couldn’t quantify the expenses related to equipment use for the audit, the city provided earlier detail in a public records request that provided those exact records.
Seems like a whitewash. Need to get an investigation going that is truly empowered to let the chips fall where they may! As I understand it, this audit makes suggestions while the law demands accountability.
Start in the mayors office and clean house. I'm sure this isn't the only case , it never is.
We the taxpayers just provided free services for cities outside Pocatello, and they are not going to recover those funds? How is this not a criminal offense??
Let me see if I get this right, TRUTHSEEKER: If I rob a bank; but, can prove that others have robbed banks before me, I get a pass? Hmmm...?
Go ahead, ask for information on past "freebies" to other municipalities. If others broke the law, throw the book at 'em.
My taxes just went up (as did yours). Am I getting any more for my money, or just paying for parking lots at ISU and Macammon?
All it takes is a Records Request to Ruth Whitworth, City Clerk.
WOW, it's time for a recall !!![smile]
If you had read the complete audit (a link to it is at localnews8.com), you would have noticed that on page three of the audit, it states:
"During the examination it was also discovered that this was NOT isolated to the period examined. The City has provided services to entities outside the incorporated limits for NUMEROUS years." (words capitalized for emphasis)
I believe the time period requested for the audit starts in 2010. This was when Mayor Blad was in his first term. This brings up the question as to WHY the audit did not go back further. To be fair and impartial, it would have been useful to examine all the documents connected to city paving projects outside of city limits dating back further (to include previous mayors) which would have included former mayor(s).
When an investigation says that wrongdoings were found; but, following those leads is beyond their mandate/capabilities, We The People deserve - no, demand - a full legal investigation.
By the way, Pocatello paved a parking lot - for free - at ISU. How come the audit doesn't mention that, or the work done before 2011?
Also, why did the audit firm only interview those who benefited from the paving? At best, it smells like a whitewash ... worst case: a Cover-up.
Wipe that smirk off your face, Blad. You're not out of the woods yet.
Clearly, Blad still doesn't understand his level of authority if he is saying that the city won't bill for the work. That is a misuse of public funds. Maybe the City Council will refer this to Lawrence Wasden's office.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In